User avatar
jerra b
23 Dec 2024 6:03 pm
User avatar
      
7,958 posts
Majik » 23 Dec 2024, 11:34 am » wrote: The other issue I have with your accusation above is how does anybody know what was stated between her and her lawyer because of client attorney privilege .....
And Cheney talking to her privately while being a commitee member during an investigation is indeed criminal.....
do you disagree?
And why?
cassidy reached out to her. it was cheney's function to gather evidence and testimony. passantino was blocking her testimony- very very unethical.

-----------------------------------------------------That testimony, though, came about only after Hutchinson went through an internal struggle described in her 2023 book “Enough.” Hutchinson was a loyal Trump supporter and, as such, was provided by Trump’s team with an attorney, Stefan Passantino, when the select committee first subpoenaed her in January 2022.She sat for two depositions with committee staffers in February and March of that year. Following Passantino’s advice, she didn’t volunteer information that would cast Trump in a negative light. But she began to have qualms about this approach, later reaching out to her former colleague Alyssa Farah for advice on how to proceed. Farah helped orchestrate a third deposition, in May 2022, during which Hutchinson was able to speak more freely. Her attorney was not pleased, and neither was Trumpworld.In early June, Passantino recommended that Hutchinson stop complying with the committee’s efforts, including an anticipated fourth interview. In her book, she writes that she expected but “dreaded” Passantino forcing the issue, worried that she would be putting herself at risk of contempt charges. So, soon after, she contacted Cheney directly. Two months ago, Loudermilk’s subcommittee released some information about this communication, framing it in ethical, not legal, terms.
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2025 Liberal Forum